The Wellcome trust which is funding this event is a charity already and I think they specifically want the money to be spent on communicating science so I would use it as it was intended. I personally do give a lot of money to charity though which I think is very important. Through one of the charities I support, I sponsor a girl in Uganda through school. We write to each other and she wants to be a doctor when she grows up so hopefully she’ll get the chance to do that.
Well the rules say the money has to go towards public engagement of science, but it would be possible to donate it as a gift to the hands on science museum which is a charity or the Cafe Scientifique. Good idea!
Not me – because of the administrative costs involved. For money directed at science education and communication, we could give it to a charity with this core aim. They would then outsource the project, to someone like me, and take a slice of the money for their administrative costs. No – I’m not going to pass the job on to someone else – I can do it!
I think with the money being aimed at delivering science engagement, winning the money (from a charity) and giving it to another charity for them to give to someone else seems a bit extreme, when any one of us could do the science engagement ourselves. It is a noble idea, but I think that some of the most effective people to promote science are the scientists studying it!
Comments